I will begin simply: this is a very good play. I enjoyed it immensely. The
cast - of whom there are two - give fine performances in their roles. The
set design is minimalist but effective. The script is strong, the
direction smooth. All in all, this leaves the poor reviewer with little to
say without sounding borderline sycophantic.
The play is about England in India, and India in England. In a house in
Tunbridge Wells, a girl named Andrea (Charlotte Pyke) lives alone with her
grandfather (William Maxwell). His wife is dead, so are her parents. They
live alone in the villa that has been the family home for two hundred
years. Alone, that is, apart from Frances.
Frances is also played by Charlotte Pyke. She is a ghost, a memory, a
secret that Andrea's grandfather keeps to himself, locked away in the
attic, and ultimately, the play is her story. It is Frances who provides
the bridge between past and present, between India and England, between
grandfather and granddaughter. But where she connects, she also contrasts.
Where Andrea is quiet, jumpy, mousy, Frances is - ironically - very much
alive, vital and fiery. The change that comes over the grandfather (whose
name, we learn, is Edmond) when the ghost appears is no less startling.
Where he is distant and painfully formal to his granddaughter, to Frances
he has the easy manner of an old adversary. When they talk it is clear
that they have been talking together for years, there is a mutual respect,
and a mutual exasperation that comes from having said all that needs to be
said long, long ago.
It is the imperceptibly smooth nature of these transitions, the shift from
soft-spoken girl to passionate spectre, from distant patriarch to weary
disputant, that makes this play work so well. It flows naturally and
easily. They even manage to incorporate what, for want of a better term, I
will have to call "flashbacks" to past events - a man and a woman
arguing over the fate of their dark-skinned granddaughter - without
disrupting the rhythm of the play in the slightest. With a simple change
in lighting and a subtle shift in tone and motion (both actors move
wonderfully, Pyke in particular has a tremendous grace about her), the
scene shifts two centuries into the past.
You may have noticed that I have avoided giving too much in the way of
information about the actual plot. The story told in this play (Frances'
story, largely) is rather like a jigsaw. One spots the overall picture
rather quickly, but it takes a little while to be sure how it all fits
together. Here again the pacing is excellent, details about the
characters, and about the past are revealed steadily and - most
importantly - naturally. For example, it is implied on several occasions
that Andrea was in part responsible for the deaths of her parents, but at
no point do they make the precise circumstances of their deaths explicit.
To do so would be unnecessary.
And so we conclude. If you are in any doubt about my opinion - yes, I
think this play is worth your time.
Daniel Hemmens, 21.10.04 |