On 4th May 2000, Oxford residents will go to
the polls and elect one third of their councillors.
Conservatives have a clear vision for Oxford and we are campaigning to change the current lack of any Conservative representation on Oxford City Council. This is a statement of the policies upon which we will be fighting the forthcoming local elections and for which our councillors, once elected, will be lobbying.
This statement is for:
·
Conservative candidates and
activists in Oxford;
·
Voters who wish to know more
about what Oxford’s Conservatives are campaigning for;
·
The press and voluntary groups.
Oxford City Council is run by the Labour Party and is out of touch, unrepresentative and remote. Labour have neglected many areas of the City and many people who live there and have become increasingly unpopular with the electorate.They look likely to lose overall control of the Council this year.
The Liberal Democrats, as the
official opposition party on the council, have been skilful in capitalising on
Labour’s electoral weakness at the ballot box; but have been completely
ineffective in curbing the Labour Group's excesses on the Council. Several
Labour councillors have complained privately to us that they miss having a
‘proper opposition’ on the Council, and they certainly do not regard the
Liberal Democrats as such.
It is no coincidence that, while
Oxford has one of the highest levels of Council Tax and poorest levels of
service, the City Council have been extremely resistant to proper competitive
tendering. When Compulsory Competitive Tendering (CCT) was in place, the
Council routinely structured the contracts to give the in-house bids the best
possible advantage and devoted considerable resources to
ensuring—successfully—that contracts were always won in-house. ‘Political
correctness’ (such as the requirement for detailed written ‘equal opportunities’
policies with statistical data to support them) has been used to create an
additional barrier to outside tenders.
Now, the Labour Government have
introduced the concept of ‘Best Value’ to supersede CCT, and the Council have
taken on extra staff to ‘monitor’ performance.
Conservatives want to see an end
to this nonsense. We will introduce fair competitive tendering and will award
Council contracts to businesses which offer the best service at the lowest
price.
In its imposition of the
Oxford Transport Strategy, the Labour City Council has been ruthless in its
disregard for the interests of local people, only under duress having any
regard for genuine concerns. In particular, the effect on many businesses has been
catastrophic, with many now struggling to survive as a direct result of the
OTS. It should be noted that the Liberal Democrat ‘opposition’ have been
entirely complicit in this.
Conservatives, by contrast,
maintain and have always maintained that Oxford City Centre should be
accessible to all. We want a prosperous City Centre, and it is clear to us that
this can only be achieved by making it easier for people to get there and to do
business there. We will continue actively to seek the views of the business
community and of local residents, and ensure that these are fully recognised.
Whilst tweaks alone may be
sufficient for Labour and the Liberal Democrats, we believe that more
fundamental changes are necessary to speed up journeys for bus passengers, car
travellers and service vehicles alike. Some junctions, like that at the station,
need to be made safer, rat runs through residential areas need to be
discouraged, parking facilities better spread across the city. Signage needs to
be greatly improved to assist visitors. It is time for some honesty on this
issue.
Conservatives will retain
the senior citizens’ concessionary bus fare at 20p.
Headington Hospitals Strategy
While we appreciate the clinical
benefits to be gained from concentrating all of Oxford’s hospital services onto
the Headington site, we are very concerned at the effect of increased traffic
in the Headington and Marston areas. We will press for direct access to the JR
site from the bypass, via a route
avoiding the Old Headington conservation area.
Oxford at night needs to be seen
to be safe and welcoming to all. Everyone should feel able to visit the city
for shows and meals without fear of intimidation.
It is a regrettable fact that
there has, over recent decades, been a general erosion of respect for law and
order and for the authority of the Police within certain sections of society;
and, of course, we cannot expect to effect any significant change in underlying
social attitudes. We can, however, work towards creating a friendlier, safer
City using a two-pronged approach:
We
want to make it harder for criminals to get away with it.
·
CCTV should be extended in the
City Centre area and in Park and Rides, with a view to introducing it in
suburban centres also.
·
We will campaign for more police
on the beat and a higher profile for the police in the community. Community
beat officers’ mobile telephone numbers should be made available to the public
in order to improve communication and enable a faster response.
·
We pledge to support, and not
undermine, the police in their work. We believe that the police should crack
down on petty crime, and should put more ‘bobbies’ on the beat.
·
We will support and encourage
Neighbourhood Watch schemes.
We
want to create a pleasant environment that local residents can be proud of.
As well as being desirable in itself, studies have shown that well maintained
streets reduce crime and the fear of crime.
·
Many of Oxford’s pavements are in
a disgraceful condition, having been neglected for decades. The Council should
increase spending on repairs to pavements and street lighting, and should
ensure that repairs are carried out quickly and efficiently. Work must be
carried out to a high standard and be of lasting quality.
·
We will scrap cycle lanes on
pavements where the layout of the pavement does not permit sufficiently clear
designation of the cycle lane, such as in the London Road in Headington. These
are unsafe and unsatisfactory for cyclists and dangerous to pedestrians,
especially to blind and other disabled people. We will also encourage action to
be taken against illegal pavement cycling.
·
We will take action on litter.
Oxford needs more litter bins in both central and suburban areas, and rubbish
should be cleared up faster. At the same time, we will bear down on fly tipping
and fly posting, and encourage prosecution of offenders.
·
We will take measures to curtail
aggressive begging, while supporting measures to assist homeless people in
getting off the streets.
·
We are opposed to the Council
wasting council tax payers’ money on sites for ‘travellers’ within the City,
and are concerned at the possible proliferation of ‘travellers’ in Oxford that
could result.
We note that ‘green box’ schemes were pioneered by
Conservatives in the Vale of White Horse. We deplore the fact that it has taken
the City Council so long to introduce such a scheme and that it still covers
only 40% of the City. We will seek to introduce efficient, cost-effective
recycling throughout the whole City.
We believe that the Labour Government is wrong to
target more development on the already overcrowded South East. The Green Belt
must be preserved, and this must be enshrined in the Local Plan.
We are concerned at the density of building proposed
in the canal corridor, and the visual intrusion into Port Meadow that will
result.
The new Local Plan should also seek to
control the spread of buildings for educational use. We are concerned at the
predominance of educational establishments leading to unbalanced local
communities in some parts of the city, with ever increasing student numbers
imposing excessive burdens on local housing.
Housing
Oxford City will soon be the only Council in
Oxfordshire still running its own Council housing. With a tradition of neglect
and a backlog of repairs, it is not doing a good job, and a change is long
overdue. Both Housing Management and housing repairs should be contracted out,
with local businesses given the opportunity to bid for the contracts on a
‘level playing field’. Ultimately, the entire Council housing stock should be
sold to a Housing Association or similar organisation, while ensuring that
tenants’ rights are protected.
The Council should also give priority to
those with genuine and deserving needs. Families who plan carefully and
responsibly for their future, who may have waited for a council home or a
transfer for years, and those needing accommodation in a particular area for
employment reasons, should not be so readily displaced by those categorised as
homeless (but who do, in the vast majority of cases, have a roof over their
heads).
The Council is hostile to private landlords;
frequently persecuting them with an over-enthusiastic interpretation of
environmental health legislation. We, however, believe that private landlords
are providing a much needed service and that the interests of private tenants
are best served by competition in the private rented sector. While we do not
seek to defend the minority of unscrupulous landlords, we note that they may
often be able to use methods of dubious legitimacy to find ways around the
regulations; while the majority of well intentioned landlords are discouraged.
For private tenants claiming Housing Benefit, we will seek to follow the
example set by Wandsworth where landlords are obliged to comply with certain
standards; in return for which the Council acts as guarantor for the tenant and
picks up the bill for any abuse.
We note the disproportionate burden being
placed on Oxford, and on the South East generally, by asylum seekers. We are
concerned that asylum seekers are displacing local people who may have been
waiting years for Council Housing, and we will seek to ensure that those on the
waiting list are treated fairly.
Local businesses are a vital part of our
community. They provide employment and a wide range of services, and are a
major contributor to the Council’s revenue. We will consult businesses across a
wide range of policy areas, and will involve them directly in the decision
making process. We will also ensure that local businesses are given a fair
chance to secure Council contracts.
The Council should encourage shopping in the
suburbs and in particular the local shopping ‘parades’. Free parking in local
shopping areas should be increased in order to make it easier and more
attractive to shop there.
We support local Post Offices, and oppose the
Council’s unfriendly attitude towards them.
The Labour Government is going to ‘allow’
local councils to charge for Workplace parking. Oxford should say ‘Thank you,
but No thank you’.
Not content with their meddling with the
British Constitution, the Lib/Lab now want to play with the structure of Local
Government. In Oxford, an elected Mayor or a ‘cabinet style’ administration
have been touted as alternative models. Conservatives oppose either of these
suggestions.
The London experience demonstrates clearly
the problems inherent in the idea of elected Mayors, with far too much focus on
individual personalities, and candidates tempted to espouse gimmicky but
basically insubstantial policies in order grab public attention. Furthermore,
the public remain uncertain as to exactly what powers such a person would
wield, but with the uneasy feeling of too much power concentrated in one pair
of hands.
A ‘cabinet style’ arrangement would involve
the introduction of full time councillors, with salaries paid by the local
taxpayer. Such a system would have the obvious consequence of excluding even
further from the processes of local government those councillors who are not
members of the ruling party. Oxford people already believe that the majority
Labour group are unrepresentative and unresponsive, and such a system could
only make matters worse—whoever happened to be in control of the council at any
given time.
We want to see new initiatives to encourage
more young people to run their own activities whether they be in council
facilities or not. Given the right opportunities we are convinced many exciting
new ventures will follow.
Conservatives recognise that, in common with
other sporting and voluntary groups, Oxford United is a source of great local
pride. We believe that the teams should be encouraged to expand their
programmes for involving young people in the sport.
We
believe that, in the proposed transition from a three-tier to a two-tier school
system in Oxford, the anxieties and grievances of parents, teachers and local
people have not been properly addressed. We will ensure that people are
consulted properly, and that their concerns are taken into account.
Conservatives
believe that Heads, teachers, governors know what is best for their pupils and
that local decisions must be made locally not in Whitehall or County Hall. That
is why the next Conservative Government will make every school a free school.
Heads and governors will have complete control over the management of their
schools.