Alfred Hitchcock once said that the length of a film should be directly
related to the endurance of the human bladder. I support the sentiment;
although I suspect the detail betrays Hitchcock's age at the time of the
quip, for as a younger man I'd suggest a better measure would be the suppleness
of the human bottom. Whatever your measure, anything over two hours has
most people shifting in their seats, which means 2003, the year of the
epic revival, has been a real arse-acher.
In the latest of these, Jude Law plays Inman, a brooding labourer in
the small farming village of Cold Mountain. When Ada (Nicole Kidman) arrives,
Inman is mesmerised by her delicate beauty, and they exchange passionate
glances, a few words, and one kiss. The Civil War begins, and Inman is
enlisted to fight the Yankees, but after months of apparently futile heroism
he deserts, determined to make his way back to Ada.
Ada meanwhile has been left in charge of her farm, and nearly starves
as a result until the earthy Ruby (Renee Zellwegger) arrives, and gets
stuck in building, digging and frankly minging. She's also handy with
a gun, which is lucky as the few men left in town, led by Ray Winstone's
hissable Teague, are capable of anything.
There are some great scenes in Cold Mountain, but as a whole it's overblown,
overlong, and suffers from a weak central storyline. Inman and Ada are
apart for most of the film, and we don't long for them to be reunited;
partly because we've barely seen them together in the first place, but
also because they're both so humourless.
The supporting threads are much more successful, with Philip Seymour
Hoffman providing some much needed comic relief, and Zellwegger and Natalie
Portman giving touching, multi-layered performances. The cinematography
is striking throughout, and there is one incredibly brutal battle sequence
that few will forget.
Of the epics set on planet (rather than middle) earth this year, Cold
Mountain has deservingly been the most celebrated in the early awards
indicators. It has some great moments, but unfortunately the whole is
less than the sum of the parts.
David Haviland, 12.01.04
|